An accusation in the course of fieldwork
in The ethics of researching war
Abstract only
Log-in for full text

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

manchesterhive requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals - to see content that you/your institution should have access to, please log in through your library system or with your personal username and password.

If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/extracts and download selected front and end matter. 

Institutions can purchase access to individual titles; please contact manchesterhive@manchester.ac.uk for pricing options.

ACCESS TOKENS

If you have an access token for this content, you can redeem this via the link below:

Redeem token

Stojan Sokolović has attenuated the author to the fact that he was responsible, to everyone, all the time, and for everything. Stojan Sokolović fundamentally compromised the foundational moment of author's faith in the discipline in which he has trained and from which he claim to speak. Stojan Sokolović lead the author to speak of war or death or peace operations or democratization or privatization or post-conflict environments or the political economy of insecurity in the maze of uncertainty. Stojan Sokolović does not relegate the author into fearful silence, for even silence is a potential form of violence. Silence is also the herald of violence, or its co-conspirator. The awareness that there is no pure non-violence is the vocative call which summons author to be responsible for his decisions, for the words he choose and the stances he took.

The ethics of researching war

Looking for Bosnia

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 70 16 0
Full Text Views 24 0 0
PDF Downloads 14 2 0