On representation
in The ethics of researching war
Abstract only
Log-in for full text

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

manchesterhive requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals - to see content that you/your institution should have access to, please log in through your library system or with your personal username and password.

If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/extracts and download selected front and end matter. 

Institutions can purchase access to individual titles; please contact manchesterhive@manchester.ac.uk for pricing options.

ACCESS TOKENS

If you have an access token for this content, you can redeem this via the link below:

Redeem token

The power to designate people, places, and events as mattering, or as mattering in a certain way or, by omission, as not mattering at all, is grounded in the practices of representation. Representation relies on witnesses; it relies on naming, signifying, and (re)producing events in value-laden ways. The realm of representation is deeply bound in trust, and in its lack. Representation supposes that behind the sign dwells a coherent reality to which the sign attests; it supposes that the dioramic men at Victory Park represent the battles whose names are emblazoned on the descriptive, commemorative plaques. Beneath the spire in Victory Park there is an underground museum with dioramic re-enactments of battle scenes. In the staging of the battle scene, events disappear behind their representations; they melt into simulation.

The ethics of researching war

Looking for Bosnia

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 36 13 0
Full Text Views 31 1 0
PDF Downloads 22 3 0