Florencia Luna
Search for other papers by Florencia Luna in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Harris and the criticism of the status quo
Abstract only
Log-in for full text

In this chapter I will analyze one characteristic of John Harris’s thinking: its controversial nature. Some of Harris’s formulations and arguments can be read as strong criticisms of the status quo. Is this a fruitful position or is it useless and possibly "detrimental"? Even if the status quo can be viewed positively as condensing common knowledge, it can sometimes be the product of prejudice. Status quo frequently prolongs inherited authoritarian patterns and the "traditional values" that oppress certain members of society, for example, women or minorities, precisely those groups that lack the power to make decisions. Their voices are ignored and are imperceptible to already established and accepted structures. In this chapter I try to examine the role of criticism in the development of thinking and culture in general, as well as the function of intellectuals in society. I consider the role of philosophy and bioethics in these matters. And finally, I outline the implications of Harris’s work in relation to the criticism he proposes.

  • Collapse
  • Expand

All of MUP's digital content including Open Access books and journals is now available on manchesterhive.

 

From reason to practice in bioethics

An anthology dedicated to the works of John Harris

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 150 64 10
Full Text Views 54 31 0
PDF Downloads 33 18 0