The indifferent bystander?
in The ignorant bystander?
Abstract only
Log-in for full text

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

manchesterhive requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals - to see content that you/your institution should have access to, please log in through your library system or with your personal username and password.

If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/extracts and download selected front and end matter. 

Institutions can purchase access to individual titles; please contact for pricing options.


If you have an access token for this content, you can redeem this via the link below:

Redeem token

This chapter argues that by early May the British political elite and media were aware that mass killing was underway in Rwanda, and then goes on to question why there was still little response. The chapter explores media coverage, Parliamentary debate and public opinion in May and June 1994. Specific areas that the chapter concentrates on include: the media’s tendancy to fall back onto cliché when reporting Africa and how this impacts public understanding; the British response to the French peacekeeping mission sent to Rwanda (Operation Turquoise); disagreements between the US and UK at the UN Security Council about how best to respond to the crisis; and then Britain’s contribution to the new peacekeeping force (UNAMIR II). When assessing the Parliamentary response, the chapter also includes a more general review of Parliament’s role and ability to shape foreign policy. The chapter demonstrates that in this period the media, Government and public still understood the crisis as a civil war and this effected the response.

The ignorant bystander?

Britain and the Rwandan genocide of 1994


All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 73 11 0
Full Text Views 37 1 0
PDF Downloads 17 3 0