Natalya Vince
Search for other papers by Natalya Vince in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Being remembered and forgotten
Abstract only
Log-in for full text

This chapter explicitly engages with questions about remembering and forgetting which thematically run through chapters 1-5. It discusses how the end of the single-party state in 1989, alongside the international preoccupation with memory in the 1990s, has led to an explosion of memory about the war – without provoking a major qualitative shift in the language and frames of reference used to discuss it. The war continues to exist as a metaphor of solidarity, self-abnegation and unity of purpose. Exploring how the role of women in the War of Independence has been remembered or presented as ‘forgotten’ by the state, historians and interviewees themselves, this chapter argues that the war continues to provide a space, albeit a space with shifting and contested limits, within which political criticism can be aired, without undermining the fundamental role of the War of Independence as a social glue. Underlining that remembering is not just a political act, it also examines the economic, social and personal motivations for why women remember their role in the war or omit certain parts of their stories both when invited to official commemoration ceremonies and within more informal networks of family and friends.

  • Collapse
  • Expand

All of MUP's digital content including Open Access books and journals is now available on manchesterhive.

 

Our fighting sisters

Nation, memory and gender in Algeria, 1954–2012

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 262 116 37
Full Text Views 82 33 0
PDF Downloads 60 19 0