Spleen in Shakespeare’s comedies
in The Renaissance of emotion
Abstract only
Log-in for full text

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

manchesterhive requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals - to see content that you/your institution should have access to, please log in through your library system or with your personal username and password.

If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/extracts and download selected front and end matter. 

Institutions can purchase access to individual titles; please contact manchesterhive@manchester.ac.uk for pricing options.


If you have an access token for this content, you can redeem this via the link below:

Redeem token

Although associated with the satyr, spleen was capable of more positive associations, and provided a reference-point in several Shakespearean comedies that is not wholly negative. Far from being consistently used as the evil to be exorcised, fits of the spleen – not to be confused with the sufferings of those constitutionally melancholic – supplied their own forms of perception and illumination through the lens of sudden joy as well as anger. Gradually, in the world of the theologian and of the physicians, this irrational frenzy was to be distrusted and treated. When Robert Burton encountered the spleen in his Anatomy of Melancholy (1621), he found remedies of cure whilst demonstrating an uncertainty about just where the body-part might be located or how its effects were detrimental. By the Restoration, its potential as gateway to perception had all but disappeared – all the more reason to dwell on the more celebratory references in Shakespeare’s work.

The Renaissance of emotion

Understanding affect in Shakespeare and his contemporaries


All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 87 30 1
Full Text Views 36 4 0
PDF Downloads 17 6 0