The Royal Society and the governance of post-war British science
in Scientific governance in Britain, 1914–79
Abstract only
Log-in for full text

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

manchesterhive requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals - to see content that you/your institution should have access to, please log in through your library system or with your personal username and password.

If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/extracts and download selected front and end matter. 

Institutions can purchase access to individual titles; please contact for pricing options.


If you have an access token for this content, you can redeem this via the link below:

Redeem token

In the mid-1940s, British scientists were divided by debates about the role, meaning and management of the sciences as they transitioned from war to an uncertain peace. In pursuing its own project of post-war institutional renewal, the Royal Society – Britain’s elite scientific academy – was intensively involved in these discussions over the organisation, conduct and governance of science. Through a survey of its activities in the period 1945-55, this chapter demonstrates a deep ambivalence within the Royal Society itself about its identity and purpose, its relationship to government, and the aims and values of science in the post-war polity. Against a self-generated historiography which emphasised continuity of tradition and unity of purpose, the Royal Society was an ideologically fractured organisation whose formal role in the governance of British science was heavily contested. Nevertheless, pervasive informal and bureaucratic links with departments of state allowed the Society to exert soft power – or influence without responsibility.


All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 42 16 0
Full Text Views 29 1 0
PDF Downloads 16 2 0