Christopher Baker-Beall
Search for other papers by Christopher Baker-Beall in
Current site
Google Scholar
Constructing the ‘Muslim’ other
Preventing ‘radicalisation’, ‘violent extremism’ and ‘terrorism’
Abstract only
Log-in for full text

Chapter Five investigates the strand of the ‘fight against terrorism’ discourse that connects the threat of terrorism to ‘violent religious extremism’, ‘radicalisation’ and the threat of the ‘Muslim’ other. The first part of the chapter maps the emergence and evolution of this stand of the discourse. The chapter shows how in its initial phase the language of ‘radicalisation and recruitment’ to terrorism contained an assumption that ‘radicalisation’ was something more likely to occur in Europe’s ‘Muslim communities’, arguing that the impact of this was to implicitly construct the ‘Muslim’ other as a potential terrorist threat. The second part of the chapter critiques the concept of ‘radicalisation’ demonstrating how knowledge about ‘radicalisation’ is highly contested and retains an implicit racial bias against the ‘Muslim’ other, which it has been unable to shed. I conclude by considering how the logic of counter-radicalisation is making possible a new form of precautionary security governance, the impact of which is the further securitisation of social and political life within the EU

  • Collapse
  • Expand

All of MUP's digital content including Open Access books and journals is now available on manchesterhive.


The European Union’s fight against terrorism

Discourse, policies, identity


All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 296 145 18
Full Text Views 69 31 16
PDF Downloads 42 17 8