Virginie Pérotin
Search for other papers by Virginie Pérotin in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
What do we really know about workers’ co-operatives?
Abstract only
Log-in for full text

In the economic literature, worker co-operatives are viewed as small, specialised and undercapitalised organisations that only thrive in unusual conditions and could not possibly constitute a serious alternative to conventional firms. This chapter challenges this conventional wisdom, drawing on a range of international economic studies comparing worker co-operatives and conventional firms. The evidence reviewed suggests that worker co-operatives match ‘mainstream’ firms for durability, and can be found in most industrial sectors. The chapter rejects the notion that worker co-operatives are systemically undercapitalised, and asserts that many are more productive than their mainstream equivalents, largely because of their capacity to motivate workers through their control of the enterprise. It suggests that worker co-operation is a viable alternative to private ownership for small and medium sized enterprises (SMEs), and that in some regions of Italy and Spain, the model is integrated into the economic mainstream.

  • Collapse
  • Expand

All of MUP's digital content including Open Access books and journals is now available on manchesterhive.

 

Mainstreaming co-operation

An alternative for the twenty-first century?

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 1656 316 48
Full Text Views 70 36 0
PDF Downloads 49 23 0