Radical coterie and the idea of sole survival in St Leon, Frankenstein and Watchmen
in Alan Moore and the Gothic Tradition
Abstract only
Log-in for full text

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

manchesterhive requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals - to see content that you/your institution should have access to, please log in through your library system or with your personal username and password.

If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/extracts and download selected front and end matter. 

Institutions can purchase access to individual titles; please contact manchesterhive@manchester.ac.uk for pricing options.

ACCESS TOKENS

If you have an access token for this content, you can redeem this via the link below:

Redeem token

This chapter proposes that Watchmen can be viewed as belonging to a tradition of Gothic that had its first flourishing as a result of the optimistic, egalitarian philosophical theories of the 1790s. By examining Gothic novels that engage with the moral questions of that era, it shows that Watchmen is an heir to what has been called 'the philosophical Gothic' in a strain of British radical fiction. The chapter considers it in relation to William Godwin's St Leon and Mary Shelley's Frankenstein. Both conceptions of the select group, as cabal and as coterie, are applicable to the discussion of Watchmen in relation to St Leon and Frankenstein. St Leon, Victor Frankenstein and Watchmen's Adrian Veidt all experience careers that have their beginnings in sociable coterie, their middles in solitary ambition and their ends in sole survival, although at the conclusion of Watchmen Veidt has yet to realise this.

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 232 95 4
Full Text Views 31 0 0
PDF Downloads 10 2 0