in Colonial naval culture and British imperialism, 1922–67
Abstract only
Log-in for full text

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

manchesterhive requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals - to see content that you/your institution should have access to, please log in through your library system or with your personal username and password.

If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/extracts and download selected front and end matter. 

Institutions can purchase access to individual titles; please contact for pricing options.


If you have an access token for this content, you can redeem this via the link below:

Redeem token

Colonial naval forces were seen as an important step in fostering regional cooperation. The metropole-colonial dynamic was inverted, with the Navy dependent upon the local legislatures holding the purse strings and power to support or veto its schemes. Welfare provisions were intended to morally and materially improve the lives of colonial sailors and their families. 'Progress' under naval instruction reinforced the notion of a 'civilising mission', where colonial peoples still required Britain's paternal guidance before they were considered 'developed' enough to govern themselves, politically and militarily. Seafaring race theory served to divide and rule, legitimising the exclusion of groups seen as threatening to British authority within this racial ordering, such as Chinese and Eurasians in Southeast Asia, whilst buttressing colonial collaborators. Ultimately, for the British authorities the perceived imperial loyalty of colonial naval recruits was considered more important than any seafaring ability they might possess, inherent or otherwise.


All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 31 6 0
Full Text Views 28 0 0
PDF Downloads 9 3 0