The institutionalisation of EU foreign and security policy
in EU Foreign and Security Policy in Bosnia
Abstract only
Log-in for full text

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

manchesterhive requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals - to see content that you/your institution should have access to, please log in through your library system or with your personal username and password.

If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/extracts and download selected front and end matter. 

Institutions can purchase access to individual titles; please contact manchesterhive@manchester.ac.uk for pricing options.

ACCESS TOKENS

If you have an access token for this content, you can redeem this via the link below:

Redeem token

Chapter 2 examines the process of institutionalisation that has unfolded since the establishment of European Political Cooperation (EPC) in the late 1960s. The chapter shows that the institutionalisation of the EU’s foreign and security policy has increased over time as shown by the establishment and development of bureaucratic organisations, formal rules and the informal norms shared among policymakers. Second, this institutionalisation process developed by default rather than design. In this regard, path dependency, unintended consequences and learning have become key driving forces behind the institutionalisation of the Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP). This chapter also sheds light on how political conflict (that between supranationalists and intergovernmentalists) shaped the institutional development of the EU’s foreign and security policy since its early days. Having embarked upon an intergovernmental path at the outset, successive reforms failed to communitarise this policy. However, because of unintended consequences and institutional legacies, the resulting institutional outcome – a hybrid mode between intergovernmentalism and supranationalism – differed from that originally foreseen by its designers, the member states.

EU Foreign and Security Policy in Bosnia

The politics of coherence and effectiveness

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 111 69 7
Full Text Views 56 18 1
PDF Downloads 8 3 0