‘To help a million sick, you must kill a few nurses’
The impact of the campaign for professional status on nurses’ health, 1890–1914
in Who cared for the carers?
Abstract only
Get Access to Full Text

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

manchesterhive requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals - to see content that you/your institution should have access to, please log in through your library system or with your personal username and password.

If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/extracts and download selected front and end matter. 

Access Tokens

If you have an access token for this content, you can redeem this via the link below:

Redeem token

Chapter one examines the impact of the late nineteenth-century debate about nurse registration on ideas about the health of nurses. Between 1888-90, the mortality and morbidity rate among The London Hospital nurses dramatically increased and critics alleged that its cause was linked to matron Eva Luckes’ increasing power and political opposition to nurse registration. Using evidence from the inquiry called to investigate the problem, this chapter contrasts Luckes’ ideology about the organisation of nursing and the care of sick nurses with that of Harriet Hopkins, matron of the South Devon and East Cornwall Hospital and a staunch supporter of nurse registration. The disparity between these women’s ideas is then contrasted with those of the Cornwall Lunatic Asylum matrons who expressed no interest in the politics of nursing and enjoyed little power.

Who cared for the carers?

A history of the occupational health of nurses, 1880–1948

INFORMATION

TABLE OF CONTENTS
METRICS

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 27 12 0
Full Text Views 20 15 0
PDF Downloads 15 11 0
RELATED CONTENT