Keith Dowding
Search for other papers by Keith Dowding in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Social choice and the grammar of rights and freedoms
Abstract only
Log-in for full text

The techniques of social choice and game theory are increasingly being used to analyse concepts in political theory. Although these techniques may prove invaluable for teasing out contradictory formulations, puzzles and problems with traditional concepts, formal writers often begin their analysis with simplistic intuitive accounts rather than building on earlier traditions in analytic political theory. This is particularly apparent in social-choice and game-theory analysis of rights and freedoms. This chapter reviews these approaches and demonstrates that by ignoring the grammar of rights and freedoms, social-choice and game-theory analysis goes wrong from the very beginning. Formal writers need to take more account of the history of their subject, as developed in the analytic theory tradition.

  • Collapse
  • Expand

All of MUP's digital content including Open Access books and journals is now available on manchesterhive.

 

Power, luck and freedom

Collected essays

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 150 44 9
Full Text Views 43 18 0
PDF Downloads 29 10 0