Poetic instruction
in Contemporary Olson
Abstract only
Log-in for full text

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

manchesterhive requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals - to see content that you/your institution should have access to, please log in through your library system or with your personal username and password.

If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/extracts and download selected front and end matter. 

Institutions can purchase access to individual titles; please contact manchesterhive@manchester.ac.uk for pricing options.

ACCESS TOKENS

If you have an access token for this content, you can redeem this via the link below:

Redeem token

In a related manner, the theories defining and defending composition by field Charles Olson presents in 'Projective Verse' are basically pedagogical allegories. The pedagogical aspect of Olson's projective poetics, in particular the emphasis upon stringent, self-determined control over the arrangement of his lines, is legible as a kind of prolepsis insofar as it closes down certain forms of critical examination in advance. Olson's proscriptions aim to collapse the difference between acts of reading and the possibly more self-reflective processes of study. Robert von Hallberg's The Scholar's Art is perhaps the best and most important example of a consenting approach to Olson's work. Olson's favoured Webster's Dictionary defines 'machine' as an 'assemblage of parts that transmits forces, motion and energy one to another in a predetermined manner'.

Editor: David Herd

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 32 10 0
Full Text Views 11 2 0
PDF Downloads 17 4 2