The Earl of Essex and ‘politic history’
in Essex
Abstract only
Log-in for full text

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

manchesterhive requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals - to see content that you/your institution should have access to, please log in through your library system or with your personal username and password.

If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/extracts and download selected front and end matter. 

Institutions can purchase access to individual titles; please contact for pricing options.


If you have an access token for this content, you can redeem this via the link below:

Redeem token

This chapter considers the broader construction of competing narratives of Essex's behaviour that defined the earl as a hero or a traitor, according to particular historical typologies. It argues that the political divisions of late Elizabethan England were intensely sharpened by the historical frameworks used by contemporaries to describe and understand the world around them. A string of texts associated with Essex emphasised the didactic utility of history. The deep impact of Jesuit Robert Parsons' devilish dedication, was to sensitise Essex's tender antennae to the synchronisation of the deceitful strategies. The synchronization of his political enemies would be to undermine him with conspiracies focused on Spain and the Infanta. Essex's circle has been strongly associated with the English manifestation of broader intellectual trends. The broader trends include the political thought associated with Roman history, especially Tacitus, which electrified European literati in the later sixteenth century.


The cultural impact of an Elizabethan courtier


All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 49 9 0
Full Text Views 32 7 1
PDF Downloads 10 3 0