Replying to Raleigh’s ‘The Nymph’s Reply’
Allusion, anti-pastoral, and four centuries of pastoral invitations
in Literary and visual Ralegh
Abstract only
Log-in for full text

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

manchesterhive requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals - to see content that you/your institution should have access to, please log in through your library system or with your personal username and password.

If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/extracts and download selected front and end matter. 

Institutions can purchase access to individual titles; please contact for pricing options.


If you have an access token for this content, you can redeem this via the link below:

Redeem token

Christopher Marlowe's 'Passionate Shepherd to his Love' and Sir Walter Ralegh's 'Nymph's Reply to the Shepherd' were printed, certainly not for the first time, but in what have become their standard versions in Izaak Walton's The Compleat Angler. This was the first time 'The Nymph's Reply' was attributed to Ralegh, an attribution which has been generally accepted ever since. Marlowe's 'The Passionate Shepherd to his Love' is a pastoral invitation based on roughly similar invitations in Theocritus, Virgil, and Ovid. Even before the first printed version of Ralegh's reply in 1599, Marlowe's poem had an immediate influence, and must have circulated quickly in manuscript. From England's Helicon to the present, Marlowe's and Ralegh's poems have been paired as standard inclusions in anthologies. A full appreciation of William Wordsworth's 'The Mad Mother' depends on the reader's perception of his deeply ironic troping of earlier poems in the Marlowe-Ralegh tradition.


All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 239 113 4
Full Text Views 32 11 0
PDF Downloads 30 8 0