Emily J. Manktelow
Search for other papers by Emily J. Manktelow in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Missionary children
Abstract only
Log-in for full text

The London Missionary Society (LMS) found itself embroiled in the intimacies of family life: from regulating and interfering with marriage, to monitoring missionaries' effectiveness as parents, and adopting an institutionally parental stance towards missionary children. This chapter explores the duality of missionary children, how their good and bad behaviour could actively shape the mission experience, and even more profoundly, how parental responses to the presence and absence of their children shaped missionary prejudice. For it was parental anxiety about the moral, spiritual and material prosperity of their children that often elicited the most prejudiced responses from missionary parents, whose concerns increasingly shifted from cultural chauvinism to concerns about racial contamination and contact, and thus ultimately the increased racialisation of missionary discourse. Missionary children's deviancy undermined the moral legitimacy of the mission from within, and powerfully contravened the basic tenets of evangelical respectability.

  • Collapse
  • Expand

All of MUP's digital content including Open Access books and journals is now available on manchesterhive.

 

Missionary families

Race, gender and generation on the spiritual frontier

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 398 91 1
Full Text Views 76 22 3
PDF Downloads 45 14 2