Party politics and portraiture, 1832–46
in Politics personified
Abstract only
Log-in for full text

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

manchesterhive requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals - to see content that you/your institution should have access to, please log in through your library system or with your personal username and password.

If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/extracts and download selected front and end matter. 

Institutions can purchase access to individual titles; please contact manchesterhive@manchester.ac.uk for pricing options.

ACCESS TOKENS

If you have an access token for this content, you can redeem this via the link below:

Redeem token

This chapter shows how visual images personified and reaffirmed the party identities that were formed in the wake of the 1832 Reform Act. By examining the semi-official portrait series that were published in this period, it highlights the innovative new ways in which party identities were presented after 1832. The development of party identities created a market for portraits of politicians classified by party. The resultant series of engraved portraits were, however, only possible due to the development of steel engraving, which transformed the economics of reproductive printing. Steel engraving boasted potentially huge print runs, and it is significant that this medium was chosen by Henry Thomas Ryall and John Saunders as it suggests that large numbers of party portraits could have been produced. Ryall's series was eventually completed in 1846, after the publication of seventy-two portraits and biographies.

Politics personified

Portraiture, caricature and visual culture in Britain, c. 1830–80

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 17 5 2
Full Text Views 32 0 0
PDF Downloads 22 0 0