Conclusion
in Shaping the Royal Navy
Abstract only
Get Access to Full Text

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

manchesterhive requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals - to see content that you/your institution should have access to, please log in through your library system or with your personal username and password.

If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/extracts and download selected front and end matter. 

Access Tokens

If you have an access token for this content, you can redeem this via the link below:

Redeem token

The spread of engineering authority in Britain had important social and cultural connotations for the administration of government and the power of those individuals who in the past had been identified as 'mere mechanics'. As engineering specialists gained greater personal credibility and institutional authority, their role in the design of warships and naval power had changed. Naval architects had a stake in being able to guarantee the design and construction of a safe and stable vessel, but their role in ship design transcended the calculation of displacement, freeboard and centre of gravity. A cultural history of naval architecture reveals how naval architects shaped the Royal Navy's cultures of authority, understanding of science and engineering and conceptions of naval warfare. By mapping authority we can conclude that authority was increasingly withdrawn from naval officers and politicians, who once had been empowered by their experience and social status.

Shaping the Royal Navy

Technology, authority and naval architecture, c.1830 –1906

INFORMATION
TABLE OF CONTENTS
METRICS

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 38 12 1
Full Text Views 33 16 0
PDF Downloads 9 8 0
RELATED CONTENT