Bliss
Opera’s untenable pleasures
in Writing otherwise
Abstract only
Log-in for full text

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

manchesterhive requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals - to see content that you/your institution should have access to, please log in through your library system or with your personal username and password.

If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/extracts and download selected front and end matter. 

Institutions can purchase access to individual titles; please contact manchesterhive@manchester.ac.uk for pricing options.

ACCESS TOKENS

If you have an access token for this content, you can redeem this via the link below:

Redeem token

Monica Pearl discusses the pleasures of opera, exploring through her own long immersion as an aficionado a new poetics through which we might understand the experience of bliss which is peculiar to this art form. Here language is somehow not enough, or not adequate. And yet, of course, we must employ language to talk about this intense experience. Questions of gender and sexuality come into play in this encounter, though not necessarily in the ways other writers have suggested. Richard Strauss’ The Rosenkavalier offers the opportunity for sustained reflection on how the bliss of opera works.

Writing otherwise

Experiments in cultural criticism

Editors: Jackie Stacey and Janet Wolff

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 41 13 0
Full Text Views 23 2 0
PDF Downloads 11 1 0