Towards a modern colonial state
Reorganizing leprosy care, 1890– 1900
in Leprosy and colonialism
Abstract only
Log-in for full text

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

manchesterhive requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals - to see content that you/your institution should have access to, please log in through your library system or with your personal username and password.

If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/extracts and download selected front and end matter. 

Institutions can purchase access to individual titles; please contact manchesterhive@manchester.ac.uk for pricing options.

ACCESS TOKENS

If you have an access token for this content, you can redeem this via the link below:

Redeem token

A symbiotic alliance for leprosy care had formed between the colonial state and the Catholics earlier in the nineteenth century. However, at the end of the nineteenth century, this alliance was renegotiated within the transforming landscape of Surinamese society to incorporate Protestants as well. O. A. Peters, was to investigate the state of the art of leprosy care in Guiana and Trinidad. The British medical officers in Guiana and Trinidad informed Peters that according to general scientific opinion, leprosy was contagious. The Catholic priests even believed that healthy women settled themselves expressly in Batavia to have sexual intercourse with leprosy sufferers, whose lust had supposedly significantly increased as a result of their disease. To settle the dispute between the religious groups, and to reach a new consensus, the Schimmelpenninck Committee advocated a pillarization within a new leprosy asylum.

Leprosy and colonialism

Suriname under Dutch rule, 1750– 1950

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 39 11 0
Full Text Views 26 3 0
PDF Downloads 23 7 0