Developing modern leprosy politics, 1900–1950
in Leprosy and colonialism
Abstract only
Get Access to Full Text

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

manchesterhive requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals - to see content that you/your institution should have access to, please log in through your library system or with your personal username and password.

If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/extracts and download selected front and end matter. 

Access Tokens

If you have an access token for this content, you can redeem this via the link below:

Redeem token

A slow reframing of leprosy policies in Suriname took place, leading to the new leprosy edict of 1929 that replaced the edict of 1830. The architects and executors of public health and leprosy politics in Suriname were not necessarily conscious 'modernists'. Leprosy remained primarily a disease connected to race and labour, and especially connected to Afro-Surinamese descendants of the slaves and British Indian indentured migrants. In 1916, the Minister of Colonies told the Dutch Parliament that the Colonial Estates were still working on improved regulations for leprosy sufferers. Notwithstanding the reassuring words of the Minister of Colonies and the leprosy survey committee, the fear of leprosy among colonial officials did not subside, and the search for leprosy sufferers continued after 1909. Dutch colonial medicine had dammed the growing danger of leprosy by using the modern policies of detection and treatment.

Leprosy and colonialism

Suriname under Dutch rule, 1750– 1950

INFORMATION
TABLE OF CONTENTS
METRICS

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 33 15 0
Full Text Views 29 21 0
PDF Downloads 24 18 0
RELATED CONTENT