Types and taxonomies
in The extended self
Abstract only
Log-in for full text

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

manchesterhive requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals - to see content that you/your institution should have access to, please log in through your library system or with your personal username and password.

If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/extracts and download selected front and end matter. 

Institutions can purchase access to individual titles; please contact manchesterhive@manchester.ac.uk for pricing options.


If you have an access token for this content, you can redeem this via the link below:

Redeem token

This chapter argues that sound evidence is readily apparent in the ubiquitous naming and use of 'types,' whether of buildings, familiar artifacts or other technically inscribed culture-forms. It begins with an examination of the cognitive basis and general significance of classification systems in human language and culture. The chapter then moves on to more detailed studies of the history and meaning of taxonomies in architecture, many of which have been influenced by biological analogies. It provides a summary of George Kubler's general theory of artifacts as 'linked problem solutions', a key source for understanding how artifacts evolve. The chapter concludes with Kubler's theory and John Minger's definition of an autopoietic system, based on inferring relatively stable features from not one but a series of exemplars.

The extended self

Architecture, memes and minds


All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 30 18 1
Full Text Views 29 0 0
PDF Downloads 12 0 0