The fragmented legacies of Chartist moral politics
in Popular virtue
Abstract only
Log-in for full text

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

manchesterhive requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals - to see content that you/your institution should have access to, please log in through your library system or with your personal username and password.

If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/extracts and download selected front and end matter. 

Institutions can purchase access to individual titles; please contact manchesterhive@manchester.ac.uk for pricing options.

ACCESS TOKENS

If you have an access token for this content, you can redeem this via the link below:

Redeem token

The legacy of Chartism's culture of moral improvement has been a major point of debate for several decades. While the existence of a labour aristocracy has been debunked it is also clear that working-class moral politics was a product of working-class Radicalism in the first half of the century rather than a post-Chartist imposition. For a brief period between 1848 and 1851 the Chartist movement possessed a culture evocative of earlier Radicalism, illustrated by the moralistic populism of G.W.M. Reynolds. Dietary reform and healthcare were major occupations of former Chartists in the 1850s, and the various sects of what commentators dubbed 'physical puritanism' after 1850 can be interpreted as non-political successors to Chartism. Chartist moral politics were therefore an important practical, ideological, and symbolic link between the 1840s and the era of the Reform League.

Popular virtue

Continuity and change in Radical moral politics, 1820– 70

INFORMATION
TABLE OF CONTENTS
METRICS

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 29 8 0
Full Text Views 30 7 0
PDF Downloads 17 3 0
RELATED CONTENT