Matthew R. Smith
Search for other papers by Matthew R. Smith in
Current site
Google Scholar
A comparative analysis of the criminal and civil justice systems in England and Wales
in Law in popular belief
Abstract only
Log-in for full text

This chapter explores the current criminal and civil justice systems in England and Wales and compares their accessibility to the public, their value for money and their overall viability. The international credit crisis resulted in government cuts and streamlining has produced an appetite to reduce criminal and civil litigation. In the criminal justice system, fewer cases are prosecuted whilst in the civil justice system; there is a desire to deter litigation by a number of measures. This Chapter argues that this philosophy is detrimental to both systems resulting in the reduction of genuine litigation thereby rendering the accessibility to both systems difficult and unfair. Whilst their economic viability might appear to be sound, this Chapter maintains that overall they are not economically viable and there needs to be a fundamental change in philosophy and approach.

  • Collapse
  • Expand

Law in popular belief

Myth and reality


All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 68 8 0
Full Text Views 14 0 0
PDF Downloads 8 0 0