Governing healthcare
The case of Universal Health Insurance – by competition
in Reframing health and health policy in Ireland
Abstract only
Log-in for full text

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

manchesterhive requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals - to see content that you/your institution should have access to, please log in through your library system or with your personal username and password.

If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/extracts and download selected front and end matter. 

Institutions can purchase access to individual titles; please contact for pricing options.


If you have an access token for this content, you can redeem this via the link below:

Redeem token

This chapter discusses how the trajectory of health policy in Ireland enabled the imagining of Universal Health Insurance by Competition (UHI-C). UHI-C represents both an emerging discourse for governing healthcare and a governmental technology-in-development. It also represents a particular moment in Irish health policymaking. The chapter argues that UHI-C was a rationality and technology of advanced liberal governing, masquerading in claims to social solidarity. Without UHI-C implemented in practice, the chapter uses existing policy documents to critique the proposal as an example of the rationality and technology of advanced liberal government developed by Nikolas Rose and Peter Miller. The chapter examines the UHI-C documents in terms of four elements of governing in an advanced liberal state. The four elements include seeking to govern at a distance; placing responsibility on individuals through choice; the management of risk; and the fragmentation of the social sphere into multiple communities.


All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 93 24 4
Full Text Views 33 0 0
PDF Downloads 30 3 2