Lucy P. Chester
Search for other papers by Lucy P. Chester in
Current site
Google Scholar
‘A political decision, and not a judicial one’
The Radcliffe award
Abstract only
Log-in for full text

Sir Cyril Radcliffe's line allotted 64 per cent of the area of undivided Punjab to Pakistan, with slightly less than 60 per cent of the populace. After Radcliffe's award was published and it became clear that both India and Pakistan were unhappy with it, the language used to describe the decision changed significantly. In early 1948, members of the British Parliament questioned Mountbatten's influence on Radcliffe's award. Mountbatten was a prime mover in the portrayal of Radcliffe as a completely independent figure. Beaumont thought that the irrigation system, particularly as it related to Bikaner, played a central role in Mountbatten's attempts to persuade Radcliffe to change his line in Ferozepur. On 19 March 1948, Mountbatten wrote to Evan Jenkins to say that he had no knowledge of any changes made to the boundary line 'between 8th and 13th August'. The geographical reality of the Radcliffe line remained as murky.

  • Collapse
  • Expand

All of MUP's digital content including Open Access books and journals is now available on manchesterhive.


Borders and conflict in South Asia

The Radcliffe boundary commission and the partition of Punjab


All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 744 495 64
Full Text Views 80 19 0
PDF Downloads 55 13 0