Curiosities or science in the National Museum of Victoria
Procurement networks and the purpose of a museum
in Curating empire
Abstract only
Log-in for full text

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

manchesterhive requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals - to see content that you/your institution should have access to, please log in through your library system or with your personal username and password.

If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/extracts and download selected front and end matter. 

Institutions can purchase access to individual titles; please contact for pricing options.


If you have an access token for this content, you can redeem this via the link below:

Redeem token

This chapter argues that collection acquisition contributed to the curatorial decisions that shaped the National Museum of Victoria as a museum for display and education rather than research. It examines the genesis of the museum in Melbourne and debates over its purpose. The chapter looks at why Frederick McCoy failed to develop a comprehensive domestic collecting mechanism within Australia. It explores McCoy's connections with, and reliance on, British natural history dealers. The chapter also looks at the role of scientific exchanges and McCoy's attitude to these within scientific networks. This demonstrates that McCoy's museum was a product of his procurement networks, which provided specimens for popular consumption and education rather than research. The importance of British natural history dealers to McCoy, and the centre-periphery and class relations that emerged in the interactions, are demonstrated by the story of Lovell Reeve.

Curating empire

Museums and the British imperial experience


All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 110 23 10
Full Text Views 44 2 1
PDF Downloads 19 7 1