Wedding and Bedding
Making the Union with Ireland, 1800
in Britain and its internal others, 1750–1800
Abstract only
Log-in for full text

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

manchesterhive requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals - to see content that you/your institution should have access to, please log in through your library system or with your personal username and password.

If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/extracts and download selected front and end matter. 

Institutions can purchase access to individual titles; please contact for pricing options.


If you have an access token for this content, you can redeem this via the link below:

Redeem token

This chapter focuses on the liminal moment, between the failed first attempt to pass the Act in January 1799 and its eventual passage in June 1800, 18 months later. It considers the legal questions about the legitimacy of the Act of Union from two different perspectives. The chapter describes the issue of consent, specifically Ireland's consent to the Union seen as analogous to consent to a contract of marriage. It analyzes the arguments made about the constitutional legitimacy of the Act, which posited Irish claims to superior knowledge and understanding of English constitutional law. Both views demonstrate the mutually constitutive relationship between law and empire and how metropolitan authorities hoped to use the law to fix relationships of power that would build imperial networks to buttress the Empire.


All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 97 44 8
Full Text Views 38 10 0
PDF Downloads 28 17 1