WHO and the developing world
The contest for ideology
in Western medicine as contested knowledge
Abstract only
Log-in for full text

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

manchesterhive requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals - to see content that you/your institution should have access to, please log in through your library system or with your personal username and password.

If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/extracts and download selected front and end matter. 

Institutions can purchase access to individual titles; please contact manchesterhive@manchester.ac.uk for pricing options.


If you have an access token for this content, you can redeem this via the link below:

Redeem token

This chapter traces the international political and professional agendas, which have shaped WHO ideology regarding the developing world, from its foundation to the late 1970s. The WHO constitution provided for the creation of three major organs: an Assembly of delegates from each member nation, the Executive Board, and the Secretariat, under the head of a Secretary General. In terms of immediate action, WHO's earliest, highest priority was to engage in a war on disease. The WHO sent its specialists around the world, bringing Western medical and public health techniques to bear wherever they went. The assumption of diffusion underlying WHO policy was to be reinforced by the pressures applied by the young African states. From the founding of the UN and WHO, the delegate representing China had hailed from the Republic of China, based on the island of Formosa.




All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 206 69 4
Full Text Views 32 8 0
PDF Downloads 15 8 2