The northern Cape frontier zone in South African frontier historiography
in Colonial frontiers
Abstract only
Log-in for full text

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

manchesterhive requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals - to see content that you/your institution should have access to, please log in through your library system or with your personal username and password.

If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/extracts and download selected front and end matter. 

Institutions can purchase access to individual titles; please contact manchesterhive@manchester.ac.uk for pricing options.

ACCESS TOKENS

If you have an access token for this content, you can redeem this via the link below:

Redeem token

The best way to approach the Northern Cape frontier zone is via an understanding of the significance of the frontier in South African history. A further adaptation of the frontier thesis occurred when English speaking liberal historians realized that Leo Fouche's vision of the frontier's significance, when grafted on to the Great Trek, tended to valorise the white racism of modern South Africa. Martin Legassick's paper was inspired by a predominantly Marxist view of history and became an important manifesto for a new, radical or revisionist approach to the South African past. Legassick's thesis focused mainly on the Griqua, the Sotho-Tswana and the missionaries of the northern frontier zone between the years 1780 to 1840. The American frontier was one of exclusion and near extermination of the Indian whereas the South African frontier was one of inclusion as well as exclusion.

Colonial frontiers

Indigenous–European Encounters in Settler Societies

Editor: Lynette Russell

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 285 65 4
Full Text Views 29 2 0
PDF Downloads 20 5 0