Constance Duncombe
Search for other papers by Constance Duncombe in
Current site
Google Scholar
US representations of Iran and its nuclear program
in Representation, recognition and respect in world politics
Abstract only
Log-in for full text

This chapter begins the case study of the representations that frame Iran–United States foreign policy discourse. The key objective is to examine US representations of itself, Iran and Iran’s nuclear program. The chapter argues that the US representations of itself (Self), as good, rational, the leader of the international community, and Iran (Other), as dangerous, irrational, aggressive and undeveloped, produces a particular discursive framework through which it understands Iran and its nuclear program. Analysing US representations is important because it allows for an understanding of how the US wishes to be recognised, and how the state recognises Iran. The resulting US emotional response to being misrecognised will then be able to be illuminated to provide purchase for understanding the powerful links between representation and recognition. Consideration of these links will, in turn, facilitate the understanding of how the politics of representation impact on the creation of foreign policy, and vice versa.

  • Collapse
  • Expand
  • Top


All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 9 9 9
Full Text Views 0 0 0
PDF Downloads 0 0 0