in Justice and mercy
Abstract only
Log-in for full text

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

manchesterhive requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals - to see content that you/your institution should have access to, please log in through your library system or with your personal username and password.

If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/extracts and download selected front and end matter. 

Institutions can purchase access to individual titles; please contact for pricing options.


If you have an access token for this content, you can redeem this via the link below:

Redeem token

This chapter introduces the central argument of the book: that one of the most important and most vexed questions in theological, legal and political discussions in twelfth-century England was how to reconcile the conflicting principles of justice and mercy, and how to judge ‘correctly’ – avoiding charges of partiality, corruption or vice. The significance of these discussions, however, has gone unrealised because of the assumptions brought by modern scholars to the relationship between medieval theology and medieval law. This chapter provides a historiographical overview of the ways in which medieval justice has been discussed. It then moves to analyse the biographies of several twelfth-century English judges, arguing that they were more than merely royal functionaries and were sensitive to moral arguments and reflected on their position, especially when it came to matters of virtue and punishment.

Justice and mercy

Moral theology and the exercise of law in twelfth-century England


All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 34 21 1
Full Text Views 12 1 0
PDF Downloads 1 0 0