Reading syphilis
The politics of disease
in Victorian demons
Abstract only
Log-in for full text

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

manchesterhive requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals - to see content that you/your institution should have access to, please log in through your library system or with your personal username and password.

If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/extracts and download selected front and end matter. 

Institutions can purchase access to individual titles; please contact manchesterhive@manchester.ac.uk for pricing options.

ACCESS TOKENS

If you have an access token for this content, you can redeem this via the link below:

Redeem token

Syphilis was a disease and a metaphor for disease at the fin de siecle, both a medical problem and a trope for social and cultural degeneration. At one level Ghosts is a play about hereditary syphilis. Jonathan Hutchinson saw syphilis as amplifying what was an inherent tendency within the male subject to manifest disease. Alfred Cooper's Syphilis develops the view that men should not be specifically identified as the purveyors of the disease because they are also its most frequent victims. Cooper's treatise is marked by a reactionary politics which is partly manifested in his unqualified support for the Contagious Diseases Act. It is by his questioning of a perceived bias which he saw as characterising the disease in earlier medical texts. Max Nordau relocates Henrik Ibsen's conception of syphilis, but in the interests of a conservative politics, and critiques Ibsen by focusing on the mind rather than the body.

Victorian demons

Medicine, masculinity and the Gothic at the fin de siecle

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 404 34 2
Full Text Views 35 13 1
PDF Downloads 28 19 5