Marxism and historicism in the thought of Abdullah Laroui
in Colonial exchanges
Abstract only
Log-in for full text

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

manchesterhive requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals - to see content that you/your institution should have access to, please log in through your library system or with your personal username and password.

If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/extracts and download selected front and end matter. 

Institutions can purchase access to individual titles; please contact for pricing options.


If you have an access token for this content, you can redeem this via the link below:

Redeem token

Like many of his generation of Arab thinkers, the Moroccan historian Abdullah Laroui is often described as a defector from Marxism. This chapter presents a broad overview of Laroui's political thought that turns around the axis of historicism. It uses Laroui's early works, Contemporary Arab ideology (CAI), Arabs and Historical Thought (AHT), and The Crisis of the Arab Intellectual to elucidate his notions of traditionalism and historicism and the way they related to political action. Although acknowledging the relevance of twentieth-century critiques of historicism, humanism, and liberalism, Laroui insists that the historicist expression 'cultural retardation' is nevertheless the best way to describe the condition of Arab culture today. Laroui posits that European critiques of liberal notions of history, attractive as they may be for anti-colonial Arab intellectuals, assume liberal modernity, if in the form of a reaction to it.

Colonial exchanges

Political theory and the agency of the colonized



All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 64 19 0
Full Text Views 23 8 0
PDF Downloads 14 7 0