Introduction to Part I

in The freedom of scientific research
Abstract only
Get Access to Full Text

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

manchesterhive requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals - to see content that you/your institution should have access to, please log in through your library system or with your personal username and password.

If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/extracts and download selected front and end matter. 

Access Tokens

If you have an access token for this content, you can redeem this via the link below:

Redeem token

Introduction to Part I Simona Giordano The weight, value and transformative effect of scientific research are greater now than they have ever been. The nature of the moral scepticism that underpinned much late twentieth-century liberalism now bows to a scientific culture, where scientific method and the reliability of peer-reviewed results bear directly on our ethical norms, our national and supranational laws, and on social activities as diverse as farming, medicine, insurance and city planning. Science has thus changed the world, and has changed, as some of the authors discuss in this collection, even our cognitive and moral abilities. The idea of writing this book was formed a long time ago, in April 2014, after the Third World Congress on Freedom of Scientific Research, held in Rome and organised and sponsored by the Luca Coscioni Association. The editor of this collection, John Harris and Lucio Piccirillo have collaborated with the Luca Coscioni Association and participated in the conference, either as speakers or organisers. But the origins of this book are even older. The World Congress on Freedom of Scientific Research is an international ongoing forum, which was formed in 2006 in response to concerns in the international scientific community that scientific freedom might be hindered by ideologies that do not stand up to moral or rational scrutiny. In the early 2000s, part of the international scientific and bioethics community was responding with profound concern to innovations in embryological science; the European Union decided to take time to think about the matter, and...

The freedom of scientific research

Bridging the gap between science and society



All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 43 43 23
Full Text Views 29 29 5
PDF Downloads 11 11 2

Related Content