Jewish religious responses to modernity
A typology
in Britain’s Chief Rabbis and the religious character of Anglo-Jewry, 1880–1970
Abstract only
Log-in for full text

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

manchesterhive requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals - to see content that you/your institution should have access to, please log in through your library system or with your personal username and password.

If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/extracts and download selected front and end matter. 

Institutions can purchase access to individual titles; please contact manchesterhive@manchester.ac.uk for pricing options.

ACCESS TOKENS

If you have an access token for this content, you can redeem this via the link below:

Redeem token

This chapter sketches out a typology of the Jewish religious responses, for placing the Chief Rabbis in that context. Peter Berger constructed a typology of general religious responses to modernity in the 1960s, based around two ideal types: 'accommodators', who believed that peace could be made between tradition and modernity, and 'resistors' who rejected modernity as wholly negative. For many years most Jewish communities lacked rabbis, which made rabbinic control difficult to impose when rabbis did arrive; hence the failure to establish a successful Chief Rabbi of New York in the late nineteenth century. In France and Britain, traditional religious leadership enjoyed the institutional allegiance of most Jews. The scientific group embraced Wissenschaft des Judentums as the best way to understand Jewish tradition and they sought to incorporate its methods and findings in their modes of study.

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 8 2 0
Full Text Views 18 5 0
PDF Downloads 17 4 0