Feral masculinities
Urban versus rural in City Slickers and Hunter’s Blood
in Cinematic countrysides
Abstract only
Log-in for full text

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

manchesterhive requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals - to see content that you/your institution should have access to, please log in through your library system or with your personal username and password.

If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/extracts and download selected front and end matter. 

Institutions can purchase access to individual titles; please contact manchesterhive@manchester.ac.uk for pricing options.


If you have an access token for this content, you can redeem this via the link below:

Redeem token

This chapter seeks to make a modest contribution to the growing body of work on gender and the rural, and more specifically on the relationships between rurality and masculinity. It focuses on two films, which can be seen to be very different in terms of genre, production values and intended audience, but which nevertheless share certain thematics; most notably, in their depictions of urban and rural men. The films are the comedy City Slickers, and the horror movie Hunter's Blood. Reading City Slickers and Hunter's Blood in tandem, there are clear divergences that emerge; the former is more firmly in the sensitive-guy film mould, while the latter belongs more squarely with the humiliation-redemption set. The chapter explains the ways in which City Slickers and Hunter's Blood articulate different modes of masculinity, in relation to rurality.

Editor: Robert Fish


All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 111 47 0
Full Text Views 43 9 0
PDF Downloads 25 7 0