Naomi Head
Search for other papers by Naomi Head in
Current site
Google Scholar
Communicative action in International Relations
Abstract only
Log-in for full text

The chapter explores the ‘linguistic turn’ in critical and social theory of which Habermas was a central proponent and which has considerably influenced constructivist and critical theorists in International Relations. By exploring the work of scholars in both critical and constructivist IR camps who bring together the tripartite themes of the legitimacy of the use of force, a communicative-theoretic approach, and the intervention in Kosovo, the chapter argues that the underlying purposes of the critical and constructivist projects in IR remain somewhat different. Moreover, neither, as they have been articulated to date, fully captures the potential offered by a Habermasian-informed analysis of the role of justifications for the use of force.

  • Collapse
  • Expand

All of MUP's digital content including Open Access books and journals is now available on manchesterhive.


Justifying violence

Communicative ethics and the use of force in Kosovo


All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 395 233 6
Full Text Views 100 17 0
PDF Downloads 41 10 0