Rhetoric, in more than one sense
in The sense of early modern writing
Abstract only
Log-in for full text

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

manchesterhive requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals - to see content that you/your institution should have access to, please log in through your library system or with your personal username and password.

If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/extracts and download selected front and end matter. 

Institutions can purchase access to individual titles; please contact manchesterhive@manchester.ac.uk for pricing options.


If you have an access token for this content, you can redeem this via the link below:

Redeem token

The notion of 'showing' implies that there is something to be shown, that there is already something that lies behind the linguistic utterance. Ben Jonson's struggle to control the effects of language, which may be seen for example in his comments on the proper use of metaphor in the Discoveries, is indicative of a wider debate about the nature of language and its relation to meaning or sense. Rhetoric, in both the early modern period and the classical texts from which it took its most powerful ideas, tended to be seen as either neutral or double, that is, as suspect as well as to be lauded. In Immanuel Kant's Critique of Judgment, as Rodolphe Gasché has pointed out, there is a distinct division in his handling of the question of rhetoric.

The sense of early modern writing

Rhetoric, poetics, aesthetics


All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 29 20 1
Full Text Views 24 10 0
PDF Downloads 19 10 0