By law established
The Church of England and the royal supremacy
in The later Stuart Church, 1660–1714
Abstract only
Log-in for full text

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

manchesterhive requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals - to see content that you/your institution should have access to, please log in through your library system or with your personal username and password.

If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/extracts and download selected front and end matter. 

Institutions can purchase access to individual titles; please contact manchesterhive@manchester.ac.uk for pricing options.

ACCESS TOKENS

If you have an access token for this content, you can redeem this via the link below:

Redeem token

The Restoration Church of England rested on a paradox. This chapter explores how the church tried to negotiate various pitfalls caused by its monarchs, the church's 'one fatal flaw'. The royal supremacy provides a window onto the church's relationships with the crown, with other religious groups, and its internal heterogeneity. With a monarch like Charles II, tying the church to human law and royal supremacy was not a very secure defence. Some churchmen therefore retreated to the safer terrain of divine law. Much of the story of the later Stuart church is illuminated by the clash between coercive jurisdiction, held by monarchs, and moral authority, wielded by the church. William Wake emphasised the royal supremacy's constraints on convocation, albeit adding the caveat that in dire necessity the church could act on its own authority.

Editor: Grant Tapsell

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 47 21 0
Full Text Views 46 16 1
PDF Downloads 13 2 1