Richard Jackson
Search for other papers by Richard Jackson in
Current site
Google Scholar
Writing the good (new) war on terrorism
Abstract only
Log-in for full text

This chapter focuses on the way that senior policy-makers discursively constructed the 'war on terrorism' as a 'good' war. It examines the ways in which the discourse of the 'good war on terrorism' manages its inherent tensions and contradictions. The power of the 'good (new) war' construction lies in the fact that from within the confines of the discourse itself, it is virtually impossible to deny the legitimacy of the war or to suggest any kind of non-military alternative. Even if the Bush-led 'war on terrorism' is sometimes poorly executed, it is extremely difficult to argue against the rightness and justice of the overall counter-terrorist war. Two main discursive constructions can be observed in the official discourse about the war's cause: first, that it is a legally defined defensive war; and second, that it is a war to secure justice and to defend freedom.

  • Collapse
  • Expand

All of MUP's digital content including Open Access books and journals is now available on manchesterhive.


Writing the war on terrorism

Language, politics and counter-terrorism


All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 800 249 9
Full Text Views 201 37 0
PDF Downloads 140 32 0