Mary Raschko
Search for other papers by Mary Raschko in
Current site
Google Scholar
Examinations of social conscience
The parable of Dives and Lazarus
in The politics of Middle English parables
Abstract only
Log-in for full text

The third chapter brings together socio-economic and penitential discourses in its analysis of the parable of Dives and Lazarus – a story that features a rich man refusing to give alms and his subsequent damnation. The chapter highlights retellings in three story collections arranged around the Seven Deadly Sins – Robert Mannyng’s Handlyng Synne, Peter Idley’s Instructions to his Son, and John Gower’s Confessio Amantis. In all three, the parable is presented as an illustration of gluttony, not avarice as in Luke’s Gospel, seemingly side-stepping the story’s emphasis on social division. The chapter examines how this penitential frame shapes the translated parables and finds two conflicting accounts of how gluttony affects the social body. For both Mannyng and Idley, the parable directs the rich to see beyond their own needs and to more consciously live in community with those in poverty. For Gower, in contrast, the parable prompts the rich to look inward at their uncontrolled desire. By casting the rich man as the primary figure in need, Gower advocates self-governance as means of social reform, effectively erasing the poor from the narrative itself and from his vision of a revitalised community.

  • Collapse
  • Expand

The politics of Middle English parables

Fiction, theology, and social practice


All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 175 32 3
Full Text Views 36 0 0
PDF Downloads 21 0 0