John Carter Wood
Search for other papers by John Carter Wood in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Between mammon and Marx
Capitalism, Communism and ‘planning for freedom’
Abstract only
Log-in for full text

One of the Oldham group’s ‘middle ways’ had a clearly secular source: the sociology of Karl Mannheim. The (personally agnostic) Hungarian sociologist believed that Christianity could strengthen liberal democracy in its confrontation with totalitarianism and also humanise the inevitable shift towards more ‘planned’ societies. All group members broadly criticised what they saw as the waste, inequality, greed and chaos of laissez-faire capitalism, and some saw value in Marxism, even if its atheism and the oppression of Soviet Communism were rejected. Mannheim’s concept of ‘planning for freedom’ offered a middle way that would encourage Christian-inspired norms but still leave room for individual liberty and local initiative. But the concept also provoked internal dissent in the group from both the right and the left. These discussions were also reflected in mixed feelings about post-war reconstruction: while the group welcomed moves towards ‘social justice’, some members’ critiques of the emerging welfare state show the contested margins of its consensus.

  • Collapse
  • Expand

All of MUP's digital content including Open Access books and journals is now available on manchesterhive.

 

This is your hour

Christian intellectuals in Britain and the crisis of Europe, 1937–1949

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 896 328 32
Full Text Views 52 18 0
PDF Downloads 30 12 0