The Norman Conquest (1867– 79)
in History, empire, and Islam
Abstract only
Log-in for full text

Chapter 1 examines Freeman’s magnum-opus, the six-volume History of the Norman Conquest. It begins by situating this work in relationship to traditions of writing about 1066 which had developed between the thirteenth and the nineteenth centuries. Against this background it is argued that Freeman attempted to incorporate several competing interpretations of history into his work – these included the myth of the ‘Norman Yoke’; the ‘Whig’ view of the past; the Liberal Anglican philosophy; and racialised Victorian Romanticism. Assessing the ways in which Freeman’s commitment to these tropes distorted his use of sources and his narrative, I argue that he was not a straightforward panegyrist to English progress, as is commonly assumed.

History, empire, and Islam

E. A. Freeman and Victorian public morality


All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 136 68 0
Full Text Views 5 2 0
PDF Downloads 8 4 0