Insiders and outsiders on a European scale

in European labour movements in crisis
Abstract only
Get Access to Full Text

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

manchesterhive requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals - to see content that you/your institution should have access to, please log in through your library system or with your personal username and password.

If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/extracts and download selected front and end matter. 

Access Tokens

If you have an access token for this content, you can redeem this via the link below:

Redeem token

Chapter 8 assesses difference in substantive outcomes between countries; this is a potential ‘smoking gun’ in that it illustrates drivers and consequences of competition and/or cooperation. Consistent with literature on dualization (Emmenegger et al., 2012), it is contended that divisions among countries can be linked to the interests of workers in the core, even if the means by which divides have been instigated are indirect. Specifically, the advantage of core countries within the Eurozone benefits national workforces to the degree that strategies for European solidarity are weakly prioritized and consequently unsuccessful. It is suggested that such partitions evoke Marxist-Leninist theories of imperialism, though differences between contemporary and historical contexts are stressed.

European labour movements in crisis

From indecision to indifference

Information

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 11 11 4
Full Text Views 11 11 3
PDF Downloads 2 2 0

Related Content