Andreas Fischer-Lescano
Search for other papers by Andreas Fischer-Lescano in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
and
Gunther Teubner
Search for other papers by Gunther Teubner in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Regime-collisions
The vain search for legal unity in the fragmentation of global law
Abstract only
Log-in for full text

Global legal pluralism is not simply a result of political pluralism, but is instead the expression of deep contradictions between colliding sectors of a global society. It has its origins in contradictions between society-wide institutionalised rationalities, which law cannot solve, but which demand a new legal approach to colliding norms. This chapter develops the thesis with three arguments. (1) The fragmentation of global law is more radical than any single reductionist perspective can comprehend. (2) Any aspirations to a normative unity of global law are thus doomed from the outset. A meta-level at which conflicts might be solved is wholly elusive both in global law and in global society. (3) Legal fragmentation cannot itself be combated. At best, a weak normative compatibility of the fragments might be achieved. However, this is dependent upon the ability of conflict law to establish a specific network logic, which can effect a loose coupling of colliding units.

  • Collapse
  • Expand

All of MUP's digital content including Open Access books and journals is now available on manchesterhive.

 

Critical theory and legal autopoiesis

The case for societal constitutionalism

Editor:

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 1501 358 11
Full Text Views 68 31 16
PDF Downloads 29 18 8