Critical theory and legal autopoiesis

The case for societal constitutionalism

Author:
Gunther Teubner
Search for other papers by Gunther Teubner in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Editor:
Diana Göbel
Search for other papers by Diana Göbel in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close

This volume collects and revises the key essays of Gunther Teubner, one of the world’s leading sociologists of law. Written over the past twenty years, these essays examine the ‘dark side’ of functional differentiation and the prospects of societal constitutionalism as a possible remedy. Teubner’s claim is that critical accounts of law and society require reformulation in the light of the sophisticated diagnoses of late modernity in the writings of Niklas Luhmann, Jacques Derrida and select examples of modernist literature. Autopoiesis, deconstruction and other post-foundational epistemological and political realities compel us to confront the fact that fundamental democratic concepts such as law and justice can no longer be based on theories of stringent argumentation or analytical philosophy. We must now approach law in terms of contingency and self-subversion rather than in terms of logical consistency and rational coherence.

Abstract only
Log-in for full text
  • Collapse
  • Expand

All of MUP's digital content including Open Access books and journals is now available on manchesterhive.

 

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 9052 1616 274
Full Text Views 1280 120 6
PDF Downloads 975 102 7