Treaty-making and treaty-breaking
Transfrontier salt and opium, 1904–11
in Law across imperial borders
Abstract only
Log-in for full text

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

manchesterhive requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals - to see content that you/your institution should have access to, please log in through your library system or with your personal username and password.

If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/extracts and download selected front and end matter. 

Institutions can purchase access to individual titles; please contact manchesterhive@manchester.ac.uk for pricing options.

ACCESS TOKENS

If you have an access token for this content, you can redeem this via the link below:

Redeem token

The first chapter traces the establishment of British authority (1899–1911). As the provisions of the treaties were key legal documents, I show how the Tengyue consuls understood the rights of British and Chinese smugglers in two key transfrontier trades: salt and opium. The movement of illicit goods was integral for the frontier economy and local populations. Tengyue consuls reimagined consular rights based on their understanding of these local considerations and imperial policy. The chapter explores two key smuggling cases to show how consuls were mediators amongst a number of different British colonial and consular authorities in London, India, Burma and China on legal rights. The chapter is therefore concerned with how consuls understood the overlapping frameworks and tensions of different layers of law: Sino-British treaties, Burmese territorial law and extraterritoriality

Law across imperial borders

British consuls and colonial connections on China’s western frontiers, 1880–1943

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 33 33 4
Full Text Views 3 3 0
PDF Downloads 8 8 1